Suyu/breakpad
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://git.suyu.dev/suyu/breakpad.git synced 2025-12-24 00:04:58 +01:00
Code Issues Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions

Add support for parsing the DW_AT_ranges attributes

Browse source 
This enables the DWARF reader to properly parse DW_AT_ranges attributes
in compilation units and functions. Code covered by a function is now
represented by a vector of ranges instead of a single contiguous range
and DW_AT_ranges entries are used to populate it. All the code and tests
that assumed functions to be contiguous entities has been updated to
reflect the change. DW_AT_ranges attributes found in compilation units
are parsed but no data is generated for them as it is not currently needed.

BUG=754

Change-Id: I310391b525aaba0dd329f1e3187486f2e0c6d442
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1124721
Reviewed-by: Ted Mielczarek <ted.mielczarek@gmail.com>
This commit is contained in:
Gabriele Svelto 2018-08-04 00:59:34 +02:00 • committed by Ted Mielczarek
parent 7b98edabb6
commit 16e08520e6
20 changed files with 653 additions and 122 deletions
Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

10
configure vendored
View file

@ -6098,7 +6098,7 @@ else
We can't simply define LARGE_OFF_T to be 9223372036854775807,
since some C++ compilers masquerading as C compilers
incorrectly reject 9223372036854775807. */
#define LARGE_OFF_T ((((off_t) 1 << 31) << 31) - 1 + (((off_t) 1 << 31) << 31))
#define LARGE_OFF_T (((off_t) 1 << 62) - 1 + ((off_t) 1 << 62))
int off_t_is_large[(LARGE_OFF_T % 2147483629 == 721
&& LARGE_OFF_T % 2147483647 == 1)
? 1 : -1];
@ -6144,7 +6144,7 @@ else
We can't simply define LARGE_OFF_T to be 9223372036854775807,
since some C++ compilers masquerading as C compilers
incorrectly reject 9223372036854775807. */
#define LARGE_OFF_T ((((off_t) 1 << 31) << 31) - 1 + (((off_t) 1 << 31) << 31))
#define LARGE_OFF_T (((off_t) 1 << 62) - 1 + ((off_t) 1 << 62))
int off_t_is_large[(LARGE_OFF_T % 2147483629 == 721
&& LARGE_OFF_T % 2147483647 == 1)
? 1 : -1];
@ -6168,7 +6168,7 @@ rm -f core conftest.err conftest.$ac_objext conftest.$ac_ext
We can't simply define LARGE_OFF_T to be 9223372036854775807,
since some C++ compilers masquerading as C compilers
incorrectly reject 9223372036854775807. */
#define LARGE_OFF_T ((((off_t) 1 << 31) << 31) - 1 + (((off_t) 1 << 31) << 31))
#define LARGE_OFF_T (((off_t) 1 << 62) - 1 + ((off_t) 1 << 62))
int off_t_is_large[(LARGE_OFF_T % 2147483629 == 721
&& LARGE_OFF_T % 2147483647 == 1)
? 1 : -1];
@ -6213,7 +6213,7 @@ else
We can't simply define LARGE_OFF_T to be 9223372036854775807,
since some C++ compilers masquerading as C compilers
incorrectly reject 9223372036854775807. */
#define LARGE_OFF_T ((((off_t) 1 << 31) << 31) - 1 + (((off_t) 1 << 31) << 31))
#define LARGE_OFF_T (((off_t) 1 << 62) - 1 + ((off_t) 1 << 62))
int off_t_is_large[(LARGE_OFF_T % 2147483629 == 721
&& LARGE_OFF_T % 2147483647 == 1)
? 1 : -1];
@ -6237,7 +6237,7 @@ rm -f core conftest.err conftest.$ac_objext conftest.$ac_ext
We can't simply define LARGE_OFF_T to be 9223372036854775807,
since some C++ compilers masquerading as C compilers
incorrectly reject 9223372036854775807. */
#define LARGE_OFF_T ((((off_t) 1 << 31) << 31) - 1 + (((off_t) 1 << 31) << 31))
#define LARGE_OFF_T (((off_t) 1 << 62) - 1 + ((off_t) 1 << 62))
int off_t_is_large[(LARGE_OFF_T % 2147483629 == 721
&& LARGE_OFF_T % 2147483647 == 1)
? 1 : -1];